Palomino Alpha

Data Center Signal is tracking 3 clips about Palomino Alpha data center developments across 1 states, including TX.

Loading...
3Clips
1States

States

Topics

government100%
opposition100%
water100%
environmental67%
legal67%
Guadalupe County sued over data center agreements; plaintiffs allege judge's conflict of interest
News Clipsanmarcosrecord.com·Guadalupe County, TX

Guadalupe County sued over data center agreements; plaintiffs allege judge's conflict of interest

The Data Center Action Coalition has sued Guadalupe County over alleged Texas Open Meetings Act violations concerning development and tax abatement agreements for two data centers, Palomino Alpha and Cloudburst. The lawsuit also claims a conflict of interest involving County Judge Kyle Kutscher, who has a financial stake in the Palomino Alpha project. An upcoming Crystal Clear Special Utility District meeting will vote on a water agreement for Palomino Alpha.

7/28/2026
Guadalupe County sued over data center development agreements
News ClipCommunity Impact·Guadalupe County, TX

Guadalupe County sued over data center development agreements

The Data Center Action Coalition and local residents have filed a lawsuit against the Guadalupe County Commissioners Court to halt the development of two data centers, Cloudburst and Palomino Alpha. The lawsuit alleges that the county's approvals for tax abatements and development agreements violated the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Tax Code, and state conflicts-of-interest laws. Community members also voiced concerns about water usage, noise, and environmental impacts related to the Palomino Alpha project.

7/24/2026
Residents oppose data center water agreement at packed Crystal Clear meeting
News Clipsanmarcosrecord.com·Guadalupe County, TX

Residents oppose data center water agreement at packed Crystal Clear meeting

Residents in Guadalupe County, Texas, strongly opposed a proposed water agreement for the 870-acre Palomino Alpha data center development at a Crystal Clear Special Utility District meeting. Concerns included high water usage during a drought and potential contamination. The board ultimately chose to postpone the decision, requesting additional information.

6/9/2026