Salem Township considers data center rezoning after crowded public meeting

News Clip2:142822News·Salem, Clearfield County, PA·8/28/2026

A crowded Salem Township meeting addressed rezoning requests for two data center projects. Residents largely supported the development, particularly due to a $1.2 billion land offer from developer 43 Group. The planning commission approved the rezoning requests for consideration, with the final decision resting with the township supervisors.

zoningoppositionlegalelectricitygovernment
Gov: Salem Township, Salem Township Supervisors, Salem Township Planning Commission

A recent public meeting in Salem Township, Pennsylvania, concerning two proposed data center projects drew a large crowd, primarily in favor of the developments. This gathering followed a judge's ruling that the township had violated the Sunshine Act during an earlier meeting by failing to provide adequate public access. The atmosphere at this subsequent meeting was markedly different, with many attendees expressing support for the projects.

Residents wearing green t-shirts indicated their approval, contrasting with previous opposition. A key factor driving this support is a historic $1.2 billion offer from the developer 43 Group to purchase land from nearly 200 landowners. Many see this as a life-changing financial opportunity, hoping for job creation and economic progress that could prevent younger generations from leaving the area.

The Salem Township Planning Commission voted to approve the rezoning requests for consideration for both the 43 Group's larger project and a smaller, nearby development, encompassing approximately 4,500 acres. However, the final decision on rezoning rests with the township supervisors. While outnumbered, some residents not included in the land deal expressed fears of being forced to sell their properties for less or suffer the consequences of remaining. 43 Group has stated plans to develop only about 20% of the acquired land, with the remainder forested. Any development near residential areas would also adhere to 1,000-foot setbacks and a 65-foot building height restriction. No construction or land payments will occur until the supervisors render their decision.