Conroe approves data center regulations as officials cite interest in city
Conroe City Council approved new regulations on August 13 governing data center development and operations, citing existing interest in bringing the industry to the city. The ordinance introduces rules for permitting, construction, water usage, noise, emergency power, and public transparency. Residents, however, expressed concerns that the regulations do not go far enough to protect the community.
Conroe City Council enacted new regulations for data center development and operation on August 13, prompted by expressed interest in establishing such facilities in the city. Community Development Director Brandy Taylor stated the ordinance aims to safeguard city infrastructure and taxpayers by requiring developers to fund necessary infrastructure improvements and demonstrate adequate capacity for water, sewer, electrical, and other services. Taylor noted that without the ordinance, the city lacked mechanisms to ensure developers bore infrastructure costs rather than the city.
The new rules stipulate a minimum 75-megawatt IT load for definition as a data center and mandate a comprehensive permitting process. Applicants must submit 37 required items, including an Electric Reliability Council of Texas grid study, noise and vibration assessments, emergency response planning, and a decommissioning plan. Specific provisions include a requirement for closed-loop cooling systems to minimize public water draw, on-site emergency power capable of maintaining critical systems for at least 72 hours, and operational noise limits of 5 decibels above ambient levels at the property line.
Furthermore, the ordinance establishes a 300-foot minimum separation between a data center property and sensitive uses like residences, commercial areas, schools, and hospitals. It also requires City Council approval following extensive public notification and hearings. Property owners within 2,000 feet and registered neighborhood associations within 3,000 feet of a proposed site must be notified, with additional outreach through signs and newspaper notices, allowing citizens to voice opinions and ask questions.
Despite the approval, Conroe and Montgomery County residents, including Moniqua' Scott and Josh Graff, voiced concerns that the regulations were insufficient. They urged stronger provisions for setbacks, light and noise pollution, water conservation, and ensuring infrastructure and utility costs are not shifted to taxpayers. Council member David Hairel also suggested further examination of beneficial ownership disclosures, generator emissions, and cumulative impacts. Mayor Duke Coon acknowledged the ordinance as an initial step that could be strengthened over time, with staff able to bring amendments back to council as needed.