Regarding Involvement in Ashville data center issues

An EdgeConneX data center project in Ashville, Ohio, has ignited significant community controversy, with residents expressing strong opposition to its development. The author of a local op-ed criticizes the approval process, stating that a resolution before the Ashville Village Council, Resolution 06-2026, is not a "community benefit package" but a "private business transaction dressed as public generosity" at the expense of the community's water, land, air, and long-term tax base. The article highlights concerns regarding the Village of Ashville's EPA-mandated water and sewer infrastructure needs, noting that the proposed solution involves an 800-megawatt natural gas plant built above the drinking water supply. The author contrasts this with Ohio's significant state funds, including $4.8 billion in unclaimed funds and a nearly $4 billion "rainy day fund," questioning why state resources were allocated to a billionaire's football stadium rather than local infrastructure needs. State Representative Stewart, who chairs the Ohio House Finance Committee, is criticized for his role in these decisions and his recent involvement in data center-related legislation. Further compounding the controversy are allegations of conflicts of interest involving Ashville Mayor Clark and Councilman Teeters. Both officials serve on the five-member Planning and Zoning Board, which would be required to approve the rezoning of two agricultural parcels in Harrison Township to industrial use for the data center. This rezoning is a condition for $74 million in post-annexation payments. The article points out that both the Ashville Council and Harrison Township have already rejected annexation of the parcels, creating a hurdle for the project. The author formally requests that the Ohio Ethics Commission review the overlapping roles of Mayor Clark and Councilman Teeters, citing the Village's own Planning and Zoning Code on conflicts of interest. The strong sentiment against the data center is reiterated, emphasizing the deep divisions and strained relationships within the community over the project.