Fort Meade data center proposal advances despite residents' concerns

Fort Meade data center proposal advances despite residents' concerns

News Clipbaynews9.com·Fort Meade, Polk County, FL·4/8/2026

A proposed 1.9 million square foot data center by Stonebridge in Fort Meade, Florida, has been approved by the city's Planning and Zoning Commission, despite significant local opposition. Residents are concerned about strain on electricity and water resources, noise, and environmental impacts. The project now awaits a final decision from the Fort Meade City Commission on April 14.

zoningoppositionenvironmentalelectricitywatergovernment
Gov: Fort Meade Planning and Zoning Commission, Fort Meade City Commission, Florida lawmakers, local governments
A significant data center proposal in Fort Meade, Florida, has cleared a critical hurdle, receiving approval from the city's Planning and Zoning Commission. The project, put forth by Maryland-based Stonebridge, is now slated for a final vote by the full City Commission on April 14. Stonebridge's plan includes an initial 1.9 million square foot facility, with potential expansion to 4.4 million square feet, positioning it as one of the largest high-tech developments in Florida. Douglas Firstenberg, a founding-member of Stonebridge, emphasized the essential nature of data centers as fundamental infrastructure for modern life, promising economic benefits including high-paying jobs and a $10 million local infrastructure investment. Despite these assurances, the proposal faces strong opposition from Fort Meade residents. Concerns include potential strain on local electricity and water supplies, increased noise, and environmental impacts such as water pollution. Resident Ron Martin voiced frustration over the approval process, noting that a petition seeking a citizen vote on the data center was dismissed. Approximately 500 residents have signed a petition opposing the development. While Florida lawmakers have established a regulatory framework encouraging developers to use reclaimed water and cover their own electricity costs, local governments retain the ultimate authority to approve or deny specific projects. The upcoming April 14 meeting will be decisive for the controversial project, following a delay last month to allow for additional public input.