Amazon holds webinar on Hobart data center project

Amazon holds webinar on Hobart data center project

News Clipchicagotribune.com·Hobart, Lake County, IN·4/1/2026

Amazon held an online informational session regarding its planned data center in Hobart, Indiana, covering topics from site design and economic development to water and power usage. While city officials lauded the project's financial benefits, a local resident group, "No Data Center Hobart," expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of detailed answers regarding environmental concerns. The session was presented as the start of ongoing community dialogues.

environmentalwaterelectricityoppositiongovernment
Amazon
Gov: city of Hobart, Hobart City Council
Amazon hosted an online informational session for its proposed data center in Hobart, Indiana, addressing topics ranging from site design and construction to water usage, power, sustainability, and economic development. Facilitated by Heather Ennis, CEO of the Northwest Indiana Forum, and featuring Hobart Mayor Josh Huddlestun, the webinar emphasized the project's economic benefits. Mayor Huddlestun highlighted Amazon's upfront payment of $47 million and a total commitment of $200 million over three years, which he stated would be the largest economic development project in the state and crucial for Hobart's cash-strapped finances, allowing the city to eliminate residential garbage fees. Amazon representatives, including Josh Weissman from Amazon Web Services, discussed the essential role of data centers and specific aspects like noise levels, with Kristen Wallace assuring compliance with Hobart's 65-decibel limit. Mike Berman projected 1,100 long-term jobs and engagement with local educators for future collaborations, while Amy Jaballah outlined Amazon's community engagement through a $150,000 Hobart Community Fund for local grants. However, not all attendees were satisfied. Angelita Soriano, a leader of the "No Data Center Hobart" resident group, watched the webinar and expressed significant disappointment. She felt the session offered a "very high-level overview" that failed to adequately address major concerns regarding potential impacts of dewatering, emission controls, the number of generators, and on-site diesel storage. Soriano advocated for transparent, independent impact studies instead of the community fund, asserting residents deserved stronger protections due to the project's proximity to homes.