AI backlash puts $68 billion in U.S. data center projects on hold

AI backlash puts $68 billion in U.S. data center projects on hold

News ClipLos Angeles Times·Imperial, Imperial County, CA·9/22/2026

Widespread opposition to data centers across the U.S. has led to 45 projects worth $68 billion being blocked or delayed in Q2, according to Data Center Watch. Communities are enacting moratoriums and statehouses are adopting new regulations concerning siting, electricity, and water usage for data centers. This backlash is fueled by environmental and resource concerns, especially regarding the rapid expansion of AI infrastructure.

oppositionmoratoriumgovernmentelectricitywaterzoning
Gov: Statehouses, President Donald Trump

A recent report by Data Center Watch indicates that 45 data center projects, valued at $68 billion, were either blocked or delayed in the second quarter of this year due to mounting local opposition across the United States. Communities nationwide are increasingly implementing moratoriums on new data center construction, and 30 state legislatures have introduced or passed regulations addressing issues such as facility siting, electricity consumption, and water usage.

The research, conducted by AI intelligence company 10a Labs, quantifies growing concerns over the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence infrastructure. Lead analyst Miquel Vila noted the emergence of 843 opposition groups across 49 states, with online petitions garnering significant support, including one in Tennessee that collected over 500,000 signatures. Critics argue that these facilities, often built by hyperscalers like Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet, harm the environment and deplete resources to power AI systems.

Despite the tech giants' claims that these data centers are crucial for global AI development, President Donald Trump has dismissed opposition as a "sick conspiracy." Data Center Watch also reported an increase in international opposition, mirroring the trends seen in the U.S., with local campaigns targeting specific projects and resource usage concerns across Europe, Australia, and South Africa.