
Data center moratorium declared invalid
Logan County, Illinois officials are set to consider land-use applications for Hut 8 Corp.'s $5 billion Logan Prairie Data Center after the county's State's Attorney declared a previously approved 12-month moratorium invalid due to procedural errors. Opponents, who supported the moratorium, vow to continue fighting the project, citing concerns about the county's preparedness to regulate data center developers and potential negative impacts on quality of life, noise, water, and electricity rates.
Logan County officials are preparing to consider land-use applications for Hut 8 Corp.'s proposed $5 billion Logan Prairie Data Center near Latham, Illinois, as early as August. This development follows a declaration by Logan County State's Attorney Bradley Hauge that a 12-month moratorium on data center applications, approved by the County Board in May, was legally invalid due to improper procedures, including the lack of an advisory vote from the Zoning Board of Appeals and public hearings.
Opponents of the Hut 8 project, organized as Sustain Logan County Communities, expressed disappointment and vowed to continue their fight against the data center, arguing that the county lacks the resources to effectively regulate large developers. Hut 8 had previously withdrawn an initial rezoning request for 250 acres from agricultural to industrial to allow for more public information. The company has since submitted applications for conditional permitted use.
Adding to the regulatory complexities, the County Board failed to approve a data center-specific zoning ordinance in June, which would have provided more leverage for the county to impose safeguards on developers. County Board member Dale Nelson, who supported the ordinance, indicated he leans toward approving Hut 8's proposal due to potential economic benefits like 200 jobs and significant tax revenue, despite community concerns about environmental impact, noise, and water usage.
Hut 8 maintains that its 500-megawatt data center would use a closed-loop cooling system to minimize local water consumption and have minimal operational impact on surrounding properties due to setbacks and performance standards. However, opponents remain concerned about the project's overall effect on the rural quality of life and rising electricity demands, especially following Hut 8's threat of legal action if the county had enforced the invalidated moratorium.