
With Texas’ Data Center Boom, Uncertainty Is the Business Plan
Texas is facing uncertainty regarding the electricity and water demands of its booming data center industry, largely due to a lack of transparency from developers. State regulators are beginning to implement stricter requirements for electricity grid connections, but water usage remains largely unregulated. Governor Abbott has tasked state commissions with addressing infrastructure funding and transmission costs.
Texas is grappling with significant uncertainty surrounding its burgeoning data center industry, particularly concerning the actual electricity and water demands of proposed projects. According to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), large-load requests, primarily from data centers and cryptomining operations, currently total approximately 439 gigawatts, more than five times the state's peak demand. Historically, joining this development queue was inexpensive and non-binding, which inflated demand figures and pressured the grid to expand speculatively.
In response, Texas has begun requiring large-load applicants to post financial security and prove land control, a measure aimed at ensuring firmer commitments for grid connections. However, the state faces similar challenges with water consumption; despite mandatory surveys by the Texas Water Development Board, fewer than a third of companies respond, preventing effective regulation. Additionally, developers are increasingly building their own on-site power plants, bypassing the grid connection process and its associated scrutiny.
Governor Greg Abbott has acknowledged these issues, directing the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to ensure data centers fund their own infrastructure and act on transmission costs. While concrete steps are being taken to address electricity demand and grid reliability, efforts to regulate water reporting and promote water-efficient cooling are slated for future legislative sessions in 2027. The article argues that the state must demand firmer commitments and financial accountability from developers to prevent taxpayers from bearing the costs of speculative projects, drawing parallels to the long-term liabilities of orphaned oil wells.