Wisconsin Gubernatorial Candidate David Crowley Criticized for Unclear Stance on Data Center Policy
David Crowley, Milwaukee County Executive and Democratic nominee for governor, is criticized for his unclear stance on data centers, an issue highlighted by his opponent Tom Tiffany. While not advocating for a ban, Crowley's position on subsidies, local control, and non-disclosure agreements is seen as muddled and out of touch with public anger over data center impacts. This lack of clarity is framed as a significant political fumble.
This article from Wisconsin Right Now criticizes Milwaukee County Executive David Crowley, the Democratic nominee for governor, for his perceived fumbling of the data center issue during his campaign. Republican opponent Tom Tiffany has dubbed him "Data Center David" and attacked his stance on government subsidies for data centers, arguing they should not be taxpayer-funded and should ensure electricity rates do not increase. The publication highlights Crowley's "curious" decision to differentiate himself from primary opponent Fran Hong on data centers, given Hong's strong opposition to them.
The author points out that while Crowley does not support a complete ban, his positions on subsidies, local control, and non-disclosure agreements related to data centers are seen as inconsistent and "esoteric and legalistic." This is contrasted with what the article claims is widespread public anger regarding data centers' impact on generational farmland and water usage, with many citizens wanting data centers "gone." The piece suggests Crowley's lack of a clear, concise message on such a "huge issue" reveals his unpreparedness as a candidate.
The article also delves into the political context of Crowley's nomination, suggesting he was "coronated" by the Democratic establishment after a "racist attack" forced Mandela Barnes out of the race. The author believes Crowley's inexperience is evident in his "word salads" and inability to articulate a strong, empathetic position on the contentious data center issue, which is described as a "fiery one" that crosses political lines.