Polling accuracy (or lack thereof) and data centers will be key in this year’s PA gubernatorial election
Data center development is a significant political issue in Pennsylvania's 2026 gubernatorial race, influencing the stances of Gov. Josh Shapiro and challenger Stacy Garrity. Public opposition to data centers is growing statewide, prompting candidates to adapt their positions. The debate highlights a nonpartisan divide over the industry's future and the need for a balanced approach.
Data center development has emerged as a significant and "potent political issue" in Pennsylvania's 2026 gubernatorial race. Both incumbent Governor Josh Shapiro and Republican challenger Stacy Garrity are facing scrutiny over their evolving positions on the rapidly expanding industry, with both candidates reportedly shifting their rhetoric as public opposition has intensified. Political advertisements, including PAC ads, are already targeting candidates based on their past statements regarding artificial intelligence and data center development, indicating the issue's prominence in the election.
A July Quinnipiac University poll revealed that 74% of Pennsylvania voters oppose the construction of an AI data center in their community, while only 16% support it. The poll also found that 34% of voters disapprove of Governor Shapiro's handling of AI data centers, compared to 24% who approve. This strong public sentiment is influencing politicians, with commentators like Clint Barkdoll noting that governors across the nation, including Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, are responding to similar polling data.
The debate has created "unusual divisions across party lines," becoming a "nonpartisan issue." Michele Jansen of News Talk 103.7FM expressed concern that the public and politicians are oversimplifying the issue, viewing data centers as "all good or all bad" without nuanced discussion. Barkdoll agreed, emphasizing that a balanced solution is needed, recognizing both the potential benefits, such as repurposing blighted properties for "mini data centers" in some areas, and the necessity for "guardrails" to address "unintended negative consequences." He argued that the solution cannot be "zero tolerance" but also not "anything goes," requiring a middle ground that balances economic needs with community concerns.