West Virginia's outdated revenue models for data centers discussed

News Clip2:11WOWK 13 News·WV·9/9/2026

West Virginia is facing criticism for its current tax approach to data center developments, which some argue leaves significant revenue on the table compared to neighboring states. Lawmakers are debating amending the state's tax code to ensure data centers pay their fair share, particularly amidst community backlash over their environmental impact and the use of outdated tax breaks.

governmentenvironmentalopposition
Gov: Ohio Governor's Office, Kentucky Governor's Office, West Virginia Governor's Office, West Virginia Legislature

West Virginia is being criticized for its current approach to taxing data center developments, which some argue is leaving significant revenue on the table. While neighboring states like Ohio and Kentucky are taking steps to reverse tax breaks for high-impact data centers, West Virginia's governor and the GOP majority in the legislature did not alter the state's tax code to add new incentives. However, the existing bill did modify revenue distribution, allocating 50% to statewide income tax reduction.

Concerns are mounting over the state's 20-year-old tax breaks, which include exemptions for sales tax and heavily discounted rates for server and computer taxes. Estimates suggest that for a $20 billion data center, similar to projects in Putnam and Mason Counties, these tax cuts and exemptions could amount to a billion dollars in the first year alone. This situation is prompting calls from some lawmakers to amend the tax code to ensure these massive developments contribute their "fair share," especially given community backlash regarding the environmental impact of data centers.

Critics argue that the current tax incentives were originally intended for high-technology facilities before data centers were even widely contemplated in the state's code. They believe West Virginia is essentially "negotiating the pennies left in the couch" while these companies secure multi-billion dollar deals, suggesting the state has "rolled out the red carpet" without securing optimal revenue.