No movement on statewide data center moratorium, housing rules
News ClipLivingston Daily·MI·5/8/2026
Proposed bills in Michigan, including a statewide data center moratorium and new housing regulations, have seen no legislative movement since their introduction. The data center legislation package aims to temporarily halt approvals and alter electricity rate structures for data centers, while housing bills seek to standardize local zoning in metropolitan areas. Small and medium-sized municipalities have expressed opposition to the housing package, arguing it infringes on local regulatory rights.
moratoriumelectricityzoninggovernment
Gov: Michigan House of Representatives, Michigan Public Service Commission, Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget, Michigan State Treasury, Michigan International Trade Commission, Michigan Department of Labor and Economic Opportunity, U.S. Office of Management and Budget, Michigan Senate, Governor of Michigan, municipalities
A package of bills introduced in the Michigan legislature, including a proposed statewide data center moratorium and various housing reforms, has stalled with no movement since being referred to committees. The Michigan Center for Community Journalism reported on House Bills 5594-5596, which would enact a data center moratorium until April 1, 2027, prevent the Michigan Public Service Commission from approving special rates for data centers, and amend the Michigan Zoning Enabling Act to incorporate data center regulations.
Representative Jennifer Wortz introduced the moratorium bill, HB5594, which was referred to the Committee on Government Operations in February and has not been placed on the agenda since. Concurrently, a nine-bill housing readiness package, primarily affecting the state's 16 metropolitan statistical areas, has also seen no progress after initial readings and committee referrals. These bills aim to standardize minimum lot sizes, set timelines for development proposal reviews, update protest petition rules, cap dwelling sizes and parking requirements, address setback requirements, and permit duplexes and accessory dwelling units.
While Michigan House Democrats support the housing reforms, small and medium-sized municipalities statewide have passed resolutions opposing them, concerned about the potential loss of local regulatory control. Other unrelated bills concerning social media use in schools and tariff disclosures have also been introduced but have not advanced. The article explains Michigan's lengthy legislative process, where bills can easily languish and die in committee or fail to reach the governor's desk.