City of Rochelle votes no to a data center following two years of back and forth: The full breakdown

News Clip2:2613 WREX·Rochelle, Ogle County, IL·4/29/2026

The City of Rochelle council unanimously voted against a proposed 75-acre data center project after two years of debate. The decision was heavily influenced by residents' concerns regarding potential long-term impacts, despite the developer's plans to mitigate issues like noise, water usage, and electricity rates. While the project would have brought local revenue and jobs, the council prioritized community feedback and long-term unknowns.

zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernmentelectricitywater
Gov: City of Rochelle, Rochelle City Council, EPA
The Rochelle City Council recently held a unanimous vote to reject a data center project following a two-year period of discussions and public input. The proposed facility, spanning 75 acres on Rochelle's south side, was not classified as a mega-site. The developer had committed to covering all infrastructure and utility improvement costs, posting a surety bond for operational cessation, and contributing local revenue through utility and property taxes benefiting schools and parks. The project was also anticipated to create 25 to 35 full-time jobs and was designed with minimal impact on fire and police services. However, significant concerns were raised by residents and city council members. These included the data center's reliance on market-based electric rates, although plans were in place to stabilize rates for existing customers. The facility would have utilized a closed-loop cooling system for minimal water use, manageable by the city's current equipment, and muffling materials were planned to address potential noise issues to meet community standards. The city also confirmed the project would have met all EPA requirements. Rochelle's mayor noted that public opinion played a critical role in the council's decision, emphasizing that while the benefits were clear, the long-term risks and unknowns were a major factor in the rejection. Many residents voiced their concerns across social media and during public meetings. The city currently has no immediate plans to pursue a similar facility but remains open to other developers in the future.