Oakley Agrees to Urgency Ordinance for Moratorium on Data Centers

Oakley Agrees to Urgency Ordinance for Moratorium on Data Centers

News ClipContra Costa News·Oakley, Contra Costa County, CA·4/15/2026

The Oakley City Council unanimously approved an urgency ordinance for a temporary 45-day moratorium on data centers, with plans for extensions up to two years. This action provides the city time to develop new zoning regulations and prevent data center applications in the interim. Council members expressed strong intent to prevent data center development within the city.

moratoriumzoningopposition
Gov: Oakley City Council, City Attorney Derek Cole, Councilmember George Fuller, Councilmember Anissa Williams, Councilmember Shannon Shaw, Vice Mayor Aaron Meadows, Mayor Hugh Henderson, Planning Commission, City Manager
The Oakley City Council unanimously voted 5-0 to approve a temporary 45-day urgency ordinance for a moratorium on data centers within the city limits. This initial 45-day period is the first step towards a potential two-year moratorium, which would require subsequent extensions by the council. City Attorney Derek Cole explained that the moratorium is designed to give the city staff and the Planning Commission time to study the impacts of data centers and draft comprehensive zoning regulations, as the current Municipal Code does not specifically define or regulate data center land uses. Council members, particularly Shannon Shaw and Anissa Williams, expressed strong opposition to data centers, citing concerns about energy and water consumption, noise, and quality of life impacts, and emphasized the need to streamline the process to ensure robust regulations are in place swiftly, ideally by early fall. While Councilmember George Fuller voiced some skepticism about the need for extensions and the timeline, Mayor Hugh Henderson and Vice Mayor Aaron Meadows supported moving forward. The urgency ordinance requires a four-fifths vote and enables the city to pause new data center applications while developing a long-term policy framework. This action follows previous discussions and controversy surrounding the Bridgehead Industrial Project, where data center use was initially proposed but later removed from the approved plans.