Proposed $1.8 billion data center project has some Ferguson residents upset
News Clip2:23KSDK News·Ferguson, St. Louis County, MO·4/25/2026
A proposed $1.8 billion data center project in Ferguson, Missouri, is facing significant opposition from residents and an environmental attorney over tax incentives, water usage, and environmental impact. A vote on the development's approval has been delayed by at least two weeks due to a procedural roadblock, resetting the timeline for a final decision. Critics are particularly concerned about the financial implications for the school district and the environmental footprint of the massive facility.
zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernmentelectricitywater
Gov: Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Ferguson Florissant School District, City of Ferguson
The proposed $1.8 billion data center development in Ferguson, Missouri, has encountered a procedural delay, pushing back an anticipated vote on tax incentives for the project. Neighbors and an environmental attorney expressed significant concerns during a town hall meeting, challenging the plan's potential impact on local schools and water resources. The development aims to transform 217 acres on West Florissant Avenue into a multi-phase technology and energy hub.
Opponents, organized by the "fighting for Ferguson" group, argue that the proposed tax incentives constitute an unaffordable handout to the developer. Attorney Jeffrey, a former general counsel for the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, highlighted that the Ferguson Florissant School District would forego an estimated $71 million in real estate tax revenue over 15 years. While the developer would make "pilot payments" in lieu of personal property taxes, these would start at 25% of real property taxes in the initial years, gradually increasing to 80%.
Beyond financial implications, critics are also worried about the environmental footprint of the facility, specifically its demand for millions of gallons of water and the need for a power plant to cool the servers, which they deem unsuitable for a populated area. Proponents, however, maintain the project is crucial for economic growth and that the facility will adhere to high environmental standards.
The initial vote was expected next week, but a procedural move has reset the timeline, delaying a final decision for at least two weeks. Attorney Jeffrey also noted that, unlike other similar projects in Missouri, this agreement lacks a termination clause, potentially preventing future city administrations from altering the deal.