
Farmington mayor addresses data center moratorium requests
Farmington Mayor Nick Lien stated that the city will not pursue a one-year data center moratorium due to legal risks, as the proposed Tract data center project has already received rezoning and planned unit development approval. The mayor cited a $20 million lawsuit faced by Inver Grove Heights for attempting a similar action against a pre-approved project. While a moratorium could apply to other parts of the city, applying it to Tract's approved project would expose Farmington to significant litigation from Tract and the School District.
Farmington Mayor Nick Lien announced that the city will not pursue a one-year data center moratorium, specifically in a way that would impact Tract's 2.5 million-square-foot data center project. Lien explained that Tract's development had already secured rezoning and planned unit development approval, rendering it exempt from any future moratorium.
The mayor referenced a $20 million lawsuit faced by the city of Inver Grove Heights for attempting to apply a moratorium to an already approved project, highlighting the legal precedent and financial risk for Farmington. City Attorney Amy Schmidt further clarified that specific rights vest in a developer once preliminary and final plats are approved, making retroactive application of a moratorium legally hazardous.
While Farmington could enact a moratorium for other unapproved areas, any attempt to halt the Tract project's approved plans would expose the city to litigation from both Tract and the Farmington School District, which owns land involved in the development. Lien also noted that a state-mandated moratorium can only last one year, while the current lawsuit involving Tract is not expected to resolve until June 2027.
Lien addressed concerns about public input, stating the city is exploring town hall-style meetings to continue discussions about data center best practices and specific projects in Farmington. He criticized candidates who campaign on stopping the data center, arguing they exploit public misunderstanding of the legal process and project specifics, which he called an "unhealthy pattern."