
Data center opponents gather together to reaffirm fight
News ClipThe Desert Review·Imperial County, CA·4/16/2026
Following the approval of a lot merger for a data center in Imperial, California, opponents gathered for a town hall to reaffirm their fight against the project. Attendees were encouraged to sign recall petitions for county supervisors and a ballot measure petition for a Data Center Prohibition Act in unincorporated Imperial County, citing concerns about water and energy use. The City of Imperial is also engaged in ongoing litigation regarding the project.
zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernmentlegalelectricitywatermoratorium
Gov: Imperial Irrigation District, Board of Supervisors, District 3 Supervisor Peggy Price, District 4 Supervisor Ryan Kelley, Imperial City Manager Dennis Morita, City of Imperial, District 5 Supervisor John Hawk
Data center opponents in Imperial County, California, recently held a town hall meeting in El Centro to strategize and reaffirm their resistance following the Board of Supervisors' approval of a lot merger for a proposed data center site in Imperial. During the event, attendees were urged to sign recall petitions targeting District 3 Supervisor Peggy Price and District 4 Supervisor Ryan Kelley, whom opponents labeled "data center enablers." The group also promoted a ballot measure petition for a "Data Center Prohibition Act" aiming to ban large-scale data centers in unincorporated Imperial County, with the goal of placing it on the November 2026 ballot.
Community members, including town hall organizer Michelle Hollinger and Imperial Irrigation District (IID) Director Karin Eugenio, voiced significant concerns about the project's long-term environmental impact, specifically regarding water and energy consumption. Lorena Minor-Montes, a candidate for District 5 supervisor, emphasized the community's desire for responsible economic development, highlighting too many unanswered questions about the data center's impact. Imperial City Manager Dennis Morita provided an update on the city's ongoing litigation, revealing a May 15 deadline for filing an amended petition and noting that the developer has filed a federal lawsuit against the city and its officials, for which a motion to dismiss is currently pending.