
Don't let Google bypass the rules we fought for
News Clipthegazette.com·Palo, Linn County, IA·3/22/2026
Residents in Palo, Iowa, are voicing strong opposition to Google's request for the city to annex a proposed data center site. They argue that the annexation is an attempt by Google to bypass Linn County's stricter data center ordinance, particularly regarding independent water studies and public input. Opponents are urging Palo city leadership to decline the annexation request and ensure the project adheres to the county's established protections.
zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernment
Google
Gov: City of Palo, Linn County, County Board of Supervisors
Residents of Palo, Iowa, are raising concerns about Google's plans for a new data center, specifically a request for the city to annex the proposed site. The core issue revolves around Google's alleged attempt to circumvent Linn County's existing data center ordinance, which mandates independent water studies, binding Water Use Agreements, and public meetings before permit applications.
The Linn County ordinance was established to protect residents from issues like spiking utility rates and dry private wells, problems observed in other communities that approved data centers too quickly. Critics argue that if Palo annexes the site, these protections would disappear, allowing Google to negotiate directly with the smaller city, which has less leverage than the county.
A Palo resident, who moved to the community in 2020 for its natural landscape, expressed alarm, stating that Google, a $3.7 trillion company, is deliberately pitting local governments against each other to find jurisdictions with the least regulation and lowest costs. The resident stressed that these are regional projects with regional impacts and should not be treated as opportunities for corporations to exploit cities and counties.
The article advocates for Palo to decline Google's annexation request, insisting that the project proceed under the county's ordinance. The author, while supporting development, opposes a process that excludes residents and allows Google to leverage a small town's government to avoid reasonable protections.