North Dakota officials debate data center engagement amid public concerns

North Dakota officials debate data center engagement amid public concerns

News ClipJamestown Sun·Harwood, Cass County, ND·5/27/2026

An opinion piece from the Jamestown Sun discusses data center development in North Dakota, highlighting public concerns over noise, water, and electricity consumption, and an ongoing protest near Harwood. The author advocates for Governor Kelly Armstrong's approach of engaging with opponents over former Governor Doug Burgum's dismissive stance.

oppositionenvironmentalelectricitygovernment
Gov: U.S. Department of the Interior, North Dakota Governor's Office

The article, an opinion piece by Rob Port in the Jamestown Sun, critiques the approaches of former North Dakota Governor and current Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and current Governor Kelly Armstrong regarding data center development in North Dakota. The Williston Basin Petroleum Conference in Bismarck, attended by Burgum, saw discussions on data centers, which are significant power consumers and potential markets for the oil and gas industry. However, public concerns in North Dakota are intense, focusing on noise, water consumption, and increased utility bills. An image depicts protestors near a data center construction site in Harwood, North Dakota.

Port argues that Burgum's "condescending" tone, exemplified by his comment suggesting AI in data centers could "cure cancer" and his dismissive attitude towards potential protests against fiber optic cables, is unhelpful. He likes Burgum's description of data centers as "factories that 'manufacture intelligence'" to a smug oversimplification. In contrast, Port praises Governor Armstrong's more "rooted in reality" approach. Armstrong acknowledges that some opposition is fueled by misinformation but emphasizes the need to combat this by engaging directly with local communities and addressing their "genuine concerns," rather than lecturing them.

Port concludes that while data centers offer positives for North Dakota, dismissing opponents and their legitimate worries about environmental and utility impacts is counterproductive. He advocates for open dialogue and factual engagement with residents, as suggested by Armstrong, to foster responsible development rather than exacerbating tensions.