In their words: Michigan governor candidates on key environmental issues
Michigan gubernatorial candidates outlined their varied stances on data center development, addressing concerns about environmental impact, energy grid strain, and local control. Discussions included proposals for stricter regulations, local decision-making power, and even a temporary moratorium on new projects. The candidates debated current tax breaks and the balance between economic benefits and community impacts.
Michigan gubernatorial candidates shared their diverse views on the state's approach to the data center industry, a topic that has gained prominence due to recent tax breaks and concerns over environmental and infrastructure impacts. Candidate Benson (D) stated that data centers must "do right by Michiganders," advocating for strict, enforceable guardrails to ensure transparent well-paying union jobs, without raising utility bills or increasing water use. She emphasized that data centers should contribute to Michigan's clean energy future and strengthen the grid.
Candidate Cox (R) championed local control, asserting that communities should have the final say on data center locations, and argued that companies should bear the full cost of new energy generation and utilize low-impact water cooling systems. Candidate James (R) emphasized welcoming investment but cautioned against "blank checks," calling for state incentives to be tied to measurable public benefits like job creation, infrastructure responsibility, and transparency regarding water and energy use, while prioritizing brownfield development.
Candidate Nesbitt (R) opposed taxpayer-funded data center projects, demanding local approval within industrial zones, no increase in electricity costs for families, and full water protection. Candidate Rebandt (R) publicly advocated for a one-year moratorium on data center construction until specific protections are established, citing the Saline center as an example of policy failure. Candidate Swanson (D) stressed the importance of local voices and protecting Michigan ratepayers, proposing an escrow account funded by corporations to safeguard against abandoned projects and requiring legal commitments for tax credits.