Alabama gubernatorial candidates weigh in on data center issue

News Clip2:27WVTM 13 News·Birmingham, Jefferson County, AL·7/24/2026

Alabama gubernatorial candidates Tommy Tuberville and Doug Jones are weighing in on the controversial topic of data center development in the state. Tuberville supports data centers with specific environmental and financial guidelines for developers, while Jones proposes a one-year moratorium to assess their impacts. This debate is fueled by ongoing lawsuits surrounding a data center currently under construction in Oxmoor Valley.

legaloppositionenvironmentalelectricitywatermoratoriumgovernment
Gov: Alabama State Government, Tommy Tuberville, Doug Jones

Alabama's gubernatorial candidates, Republican Tommy Tuberville and Democrat Doug Jones, are actively debating the future of data center development in the state, a topic that has become highly controversial.

Currently, Alabama has 20 data centers, with a specific project in the Oxmoor Valley community facing multiple lawsuits and intense scrutiny. This local controversy has brought the broader issue of data center impacts to the forefront of the state's political discourse.

Senator Tommy Tuberville, a gubernatorial hopeful, views data centers as a significant economic win for Alabama, generating revenue for schools, law enforcement, and infrastructure. However, he insists on strict guidelines for developers, requiring them to utilize recycled water techniques, avoid fresh drinking water sources, and cover all energy infrastructure and grid costs without burdening Alabama taxpayers. He also expressed concern about keeping U.S. data within the country, specifically in red states.

His challenger, Doug Jones, proposes a one-year moratorium on data center construction. He argues this pause is necessary for state leaders and residents to thoroughly understand the environmental, social, and animal impacts, including issues related to power consumption and noise pollution. Jones emphasizes the need for transparency and full information for communities, opposing non-disclosure agreements and the idea of offering incentives for these projects.