OPINION: Buckeye State now Silicon Valley’s dump for energy-sapping data centers | Opinion

OPINION: Buckeye State now Silicon Valley’s dump for energy-sapping data centers | Opinion

News ClipDayton Daily News·Dublin, Franklin County, OH·4/20/2026

An opinion piece advocates for a statewide ballot initiative in Ohio to ban new data center construction, citing concerns over high energy and water consumption and extensive tax incentives. The effort faces an uphill battle to collect enough signatures by the July 1 deadline for the November ballot. The author also raises concerns about electricity rate increases being shifted to residential customers.

oppositionenvironmentalelectricitywatermoratoriumgovernment
Gov: Ohio Office of Consumers’ Counsel, Ohio Environmental Council, Ohio State University Extension, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Ohio Statehouse
An opinion column in the Dayton Daily News highlights an ongoing effort by Ohioans to halt the construction of new data centers across the state. The initiative seeks to place a constitutional amendment on the November ballot that would ban these facilities, which critics argue consume vast amounts of power and water while offering relatively few jobs. According to the Ohio Environmental Council, data centers in Ohio received approximately $2.5 billion in state and local tax incentives between 2017 and 2024. The article notes that U.S. data centers used an estimated 176 terawatt-hours of electricity in 2023, more than the entire state of New Jersey, with projections for this demand to significantly increase by 2028. Hyperscale data centers can also use millions of gallons of water daily. The proposed ban faces significant challenges, including a difficult process for amending Ohio's constitution, the immense political influence of 'Big Data' companies, and a July 1 deadline to collect 418,487 valid voter signatures from at least 44 of Ohio's 88 counties. The author, Thomas Suddes, draws parallels to historical exploitation of rural Ohio and urges voters to unite against powerful interests. Furthermore, the article ties the issue of rural data centers to concerns about electricity rates, warning that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio must ensure that the substantial costs of power plants needed to supply these facilities are not covertly passed on to residential electricity customers. The column concludes by emphasizing the potential financial boon for out-of-state data center owners compared to the costs borne by Ohioans.