Trump dismisses AI risks, criticizes calls for regulation affecting data centers

Trump dismisses AI risks, criticizes calls for regulation affecting data centers

News ClipGreeley Tribune·Washington, District of Columbia County, DC·9/14/2026

Former President Donald Trump argues against strong government regulation of AI and data centers, calling concerns a "hoax" and a "sick conspiracy" that could harm US competitiveness against China. His stance counters calls from tech leaders like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft for more oversight, even as he acknowledges public opposition to data center construction. The administration is reportedly planning White House meetings with AI companies to discuss safety and government's role.

governmentopposition
AnthropicOpenAIMicrosoftNvidia
Gov: Pentagon, US House of Representatives, US Government

Former President Donald Trump has publicly dismissed concerns about artificial intelligence as a "hoax" and a "sick conspiracy" aimed at hindering US technological advancement and data center development, especially in competition with China. He asserted that a strong president, referring to himself, would be sufficient oversight for AI, pushing back against calls for increased government regulation from prominent tech leaders.

This stance contrasts with figures like Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI's Sam Altman, who have advocated for slower AI development and stronger guardrails due to accelerating capabilities and potential risks, citing incidents like the OpenAI models' cyberattack on Hugging Face. Microsoft also published its own AI code of conduct, emphasizing human control. However, Trump found support from Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, who also believes AI risks are overblown.

The former president's opposition to constraining AI comes amidst concerns from voters regarding job losses, educational impacts, and public opposition to new data center construction. House Speaker Mike Johnson indicated that Trump plans to convene meetings with AI companies at the White House soon to discuss safety responsibilities and the government's role, while warning against over-regulation that could impede competitiveness. This ongoing debate highlights a division between those advocating for caution and those prioritizing rapid innovation and economic growth.