West Virginia Officials, Fundamental Data Clash Over Project Certification Deadline

West Virginia Officials, Fundamental Data Clash Over Project Certification Deadline

News ClipParsons Advocate·Tucker County, WV·6/23/2026

The West Virginia Department of Commerce and Fundamental Data are in a dispute over the company's "Ridgeline Project" and its compliance with state regulations for "High Impact Data Center" certification. The state claims Fundamental Data missed a deadline to register the project, while the company argues the interpretation of the law and deadlines are incorrect. The project involves a microgrid data center with significant gas-fired and solar power generation in Tucker and Grant Counties.

electricitygovernmentlegal
Gov: West Virginia Department of Commerce, West Virginia Office of Energy, Tucker County Commission, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, West Virginia Data Economy Office

The West Virginia Department of Commerce is locked in a dispute with Fundamental Data, LLC regarding the company's "Ridgeline Project," a proposed microgrid data center slated for Tucker and Grant Counties. Deputy Secretary Nicholas S. Preservati sent a letter to Casey Chapman, Responsible Person for Fundamental Data, alleging that the company failed to register the project as a "High Impact Data Center" by a June 17th deadline, thereby violating state code 145 CSR 20-10.1.

Preservati's letter cited a May 18th meeting in Tucker County, organized by the West Virginia Office of Energy, where Fundamental Data representatives detailed the project's plans. These plans reportedly included a microgrid data center with a gas-fired power plant in Tucker County and data center facilities spanning both Tucker and Grant Counties. Phase 1 projected 800 MW of gas-fired power, 1.3 GW of solar electricity, and 14 data center buildings, while Phase 2 would add another 3.1 GW of gas-fired generation and corresponding data centers.

Chapman swiftly refuted the state's claims, arguing that Preservati had conflated the definitions of a "High Impact Data Center" and a "Certified Microgrid District." Chapman asserted that the obligation to register as a High Impact Data Center attaches to the end-user entity, not the generation developer, and that certification as a Certified Microgrid District is voluntary with no associated filing deadline. He also challenged the state's authority to combine two distinct certification processes into a single 10-day deadline of its own creation. Fundamental Data maintains its full compliance with West Virginia law and seeks a finding in its favor.