NEWS 03-19-26 Frederick Rezoning Explosion + Fort Detrick Lab Alarm + Data Center Referendum Drama
News Clip5:40Everything Frederick LIVE!·Frederick County, MD·3/19/2026
Frederick County's proposed IW2 plan for industrial rezoning faced significant opposition from residents concerned about traffic, water/sewer strain, and rural character. Concurrently, a heated debate is ongoing regarding a data center referendum, with county leaders urging the Board of Elections not to reject signatures while a council member criticizes the move as interference. An underlying legal dispute questions the referendum's validity.
zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernmentwaterlegal
Gov: Frederick County Planning Commission, Frederick County Council, Maryland Board of Elections, Maryland Department of Environment, Maryland Department of Commerce, Jessica Fitzwater, Brad Young, Steve McCay, National Institutes of Health, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Maryland Senate, Maryland House
Frederick County's Planning Commission recently held a public hearing on the proposed IW2 plan, a measure that could significantly expand industrial-zoned land, particularly around Maryland 180 and the I7 Jefferson Pike employment district. Approximately 70% of the 50 speakers at the hearing voiced opposition, citing concerns about increased traffic, strain on water and sewer systems, loss of rural character, and negative impacts on view sheds. Supporters, many with ties to the development sector, argued that the county faces a shortage of industrial land, hindering business opportunities due to a lack of properly zoned sites. The Planning Commission will conduct a workshop before sending its recommendation to the County Council for further public hearings and revisions.
Meanwhile, a contentious "data center referendum" has escalated in Frederick County. County leaders Jessica Fitzwater and Brad Young sent a letter to the Board of Elections, urging them not to reject data center referendum signatures outright, warning that such a move would erode public trust in elections. In response, County Council member Steve McCay criticized the letter as improper interference, especially on county letterhead, contending that election officials should operate independently and that budget season pressures could be coercive. Referendum organizers echoed McCay's sentiments, questioning the timing and motives behind the letter, particularly after they had reportedly exceeded the necessary signature thresholds.
The legal dispute surrounding the referendum's validity persists, with county attorneys arguing that the specific zoning action in question is not subject to a referendum under Maryland law, a position disputed by lawyers representing the referendum's proponents.