
Packed Upper Merion Twp. meeting highlights deep divide over proposed data center campus
A proposed 4.5 million square foot data center campus in Upper Merion Township, Pennsylvania, faced significant opposition and some support at a recent Planning Commission meeting. Residents raised quality-of-life concerns, while the developer highlighted economic benefits. The commission took no action, leaving the project's status uncertain, especially given new, stricter township ordinances.
A proposed "Renaissance Park and Innovation Data Center Campus" in Upper Merion Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, sparked a deeply divided public response during a recent Planning Commission meeting. The project, which would include five data center sites totaling over 4.5 million square feet in King of Prussia, drew a standing-room-only crowd with fire officials and police present to manage the capacity.
Opponents, including Patti Erickson of Upper Merion Against Data Centers and resident Kaitlin Hartung, voiced concerns about quality of life, neighborhood impact, and the detrimental effects of having a "giant data center" in their backyard. In contrast, developer Brian O'Neill of MLP Ventures addressed the crowd, emphasizing the project's economic benefits such as a 54% increase in township tax revenue and the creation of numerous jobs, surpassing even the Comcast tower development. Labor leaders, including Orville Robinson of Steamfitters Local 420, also supported the project for its job creation and downplayed local energy consumption concerns by noting the broader PGM network.
Despite Upper Merion Township supervisors having passed a new ordinance in March to tighten regulations on data centers regarding noise, energy, water use, building size, height, zoning, and buffers, the "Renaissance Park" application was submitted before these new rules took effect and is thus being reviewed under previous guidelines. However, representatives like Edmund Campbell of Campbell Rocco Law indicated that developers are willing to make concessions to meet some of the new ordinance's requirements. The Planning Commission did not make a recommendation at the meeting, leaving the project's future uncertain.