Rochester residents raise concerns about Google data center project

Rochester residents raise concerns about Google data center project

News ClipPost Bulletin·Rochester, Olmsted County, MN·9/26/2026

Residents in Rochester, Minnesota, are raising strong opposition to a proposed hyperscale Google data center, codenamed Project Skyway. They argue that the city government is prioritizing economic interests over public health, safety, and quality of life by inadequately scrutinizing the project's environmental and noise impacts under a "Light Industrial" zoning label. The letter demands that city officials conduct an independent evaluation of the project's significant scale and potential consequences.

oppositionenvironmentalzoninggovernment
Google
Gov: City government

Residents of Rochester, Minnesota, are vocalizing strong opposition to the proposed hyperscale Google data center, identified as Project Skyway. A letter to the editor in the Post Bulletin asserts that supporting the data center's construction near residential areas places economic gains above the health, safety, and quality of life of the community. The author describes Project Skyway as a massive industrial operation, not a typical "Light Industrial" facility, and argues that its scale demands rigorous, independent scrutiny.

The letter criticizes the use of a "Light Industrial" zoning label to potentially bypass necessary environmental reviews, highlighting concerns about continuous low-frequency noise, industrial activity, extraordinary energy demands, and broader environmental consequences. It states that low-frequency noise can travel for miles, is difficult to mitigate, and can severely impact sleep and overall well-being. The author contends that Ryan Companies US, Inc. and Google, alongside city government, are failing to meaningfully address these significant impacts.

Calling for the city government to fulfill its responsibilities, the letter emphasizes that no profit, political pressure, or economic incentive should outweigh public safety and well-being. This ongoing opposition underscores a demand for independent evaluation of the project's impacts rather than relying on developer assurances.