The WI Legislature failed to improve data center oversight, so now what? -
The Wisconsin Legislature failed to pass bills aimed at strengthening oversight of data center construction, despite bipartisan public concern. Both Democratic and Republican proposals addressing utility rates, natural resources, and tax breaks did not advance. This legislative inaction leaves data center growth largely unregulated, raising concerns about utility costs and environmental impact.
The Wisconsin Legislature concluded its session without passing any new oversight for data center construction, despite growing public concern and bipartisan sentiment against unchecked growth, according to an article from Up North News. A Marquette Law School poll revealed that 70% of respondents believe data centers create more costs than benefits.
Republicans blocked a Democratic bill aimed at strengthening oversight, which included requirements for 70% renewable energy for tax breaks, prevailing wages for construction, and quarterly water and energy use reports. Concurrently, Republicans failed to pass their own bill, which offered weaker protections for utility ratepayers and natural resources, proposing on-site renewable energy generation and "closed loop" water systems. Critics, including Rep. Angela Stroud (D-Ashland), expressed frustration over the legislative failure, emphasizing the need for regulatory certainty for communities and businesses.
With 53 data centers operating and a dozen more proposed, mainly in the southeast corner of the state, the issue remains a hot topic, driven by the need for cooler climates, access to water, and tax incentives. Public opposition has also grown due to secret deals involving non-disclosure agreements with tech companies. The upcoming November elections, which will determine control of the state Senate, Assembly, and the governor's office, are expected to shape the future of data center oversight, with Democratic gubernatorial candidates like Missy Hughes and former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes speaking out on the need for stronger protections.