Ferguson postpones discussion on tax breaks for development and data center project

Ferguson postpones discussion on tax breaks for development and data center project

News ClipSTLPR·Ferguson, St. Louis County, MO·4/24/2026

Ferguson city leaders postponed a vote on substantial tax breaks for a large redevelopment project, including a data center, at the former Emerson campus. The decision to delay comes amidst strong opposition from residents and local organizations, who raised concerns about environmental and economic impacts.

governmentoppositionenvironmentalelectricity
Gov: Ferguson City Council, Ferguson Human Rights Commission, Ferguson-Florissant School District
Ferguson city leaders have postponed a crucial vote on tax breaks for a major redevelopment project at the former Emerson campus, which is slated to include a data center. The Ferguson City Council voted on Thursday night to delay the decision until at least April 30, following intense criticism from residents and local organizations. New Mayor Adrian Shropshire and Councilman Jamil Franklin, who opposes the tax abatements, supported the delay. The proposed development, spearheaded by attorney Jim Onder and involving SSL Investments, seeks to transform the 217-acre campus into a multiuse innovation hub. It could involve up to $22 billion in industrial revenue bonds and significant city investments, along with 15 years of real property tax abatements. Developers project $30 million in new tax revenue for Ferguson during the abatement period, provided SSL Investments retains at least 250 jobs. However, the plan has encountered significant opposition, with almost all public commenters at the council meeting objecting or calling for a delay. Concerns have been raised by the St. Louis County NAACP, the Ferguson Human Rights Commission, and the Ferguson-Florissant School District, which criticized the potential loss of school funding. Residents, like Melanie Marie, warned council members of electoral consequences, citing a recent incident in Festus where council members who approved a data center proposal lost reelection. Environmental impacts and the rapid pace of the vote were also major points of contention, with developers stating the campus would only use diesel power for backup generators.