
New Kent leaders struggle with how to approach data centers
News ClipDaily Press·New Kent County, VA·4/25/2026
New Kent County leaders are debating a proposed technology overlay district along Route 33 to guide potential data center development. Some supervisors and residents express strong opposition due to concerns about water, electricity, and noise. The Board of Supervisors agreed to advance the proposal to a public hearing despite the divisions.
zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernmentelectricitywater
Gov: New Kent Board of Supervisors, New Kent Planning Commission, Goochland County officials, James City County officials
New Kent County, Virginia, is grappling with how to address potential data center development, despite not yet having received any specific proposals. A proposed "technology overlay district" along the Route 33 corridor, presented by Community Development Director Joshua Airaghi, aims to designate suitable areas for these facilities. However, the proposal has sparked considerable debate among the Board of Supervisors and local residents.
Supervisor Ron Stiers has emerged as a strong opponent, urging fellow board members to reject the overlay district. He contends that adopting the district would signal New Kent County's welcoming stance towards data centers, which he believes threaten the "peace of mind and tranquility of rural living" due to concerns about water and power consumption, and noise pollution. Stiers explicitly stated that New Kent should not emulate more developed counties like Henrico or Goochland and highlighted the county's proximity to historic sites.
Conversely, Supervisor Thomas Evelyn criticized Stiers' approach, accusing him of political maneuvering. Supervisor Amy Pearson, while also expressing opposition to a fast-tracked application process without public hearings, advocated for allowing the debate over the ordinance to "play out" through public hearings. Residents like Sandi Gauthier and Isabel Jarvis voiced their strong disapproval, fearing the devaluation of their properties and arguing that the overlay district actively invites unwanted development. The supervisors ultimately agreed to advance the district proposal to a public hearing and a formal vote later in the year, despite ongoing public and internal divisions.