Nottingham's data center challenge a concern for all Granite Staters: Rafter

Nottingham's data center challenge a concern for all Granite Staters: Rafter

News ClipSeacoastonline.com·Nottingham, Rockingham County, NH·6/24/2026

A proposed AI data center in Nottingham, New Hampshire, is sparking significant concerns regarding its potential impact on the community's rural character, noise levels, and substantial demands on local water and electricity resources. Hal Rafter, a candidate for State Representative, argues that the project offers uncertain benefits while imposing considerable costs, advocating for local decision-making to protect the state's natural resources and quality of life. The debate highlights broader questions about New Hampshire's future development priorities.

oppositionenvironmentalelectricitywaterzoninggovernment
Gov: New Hampshire State Legislature

Hal Rafter, a former State Representative and current candidate for State Rep in Rockingham District 1 (Nottingham & Northwood), has voiced strong opposition to a proposed AI data center in Nottingham, New Hampshire. Rafter warns that the project poses significant threats to the state's rural character, natural resources, and local decision-making principles.

The proposed facility, despite claims of economic benefits, is criticized for its extensive resource demands and potential negative impacts. Rafter highlights concerns about constant industrial noise from cooling systems, massive water consumption in a state already experiencing drought conditions, and enormous electricity demands that could strain the grid, require new infrastructure, and lead to higher energy rates or noisy, polluting on-site gas turbines.

He argues that the economic benefits, such as job creation and tax revenue, are often overstated for data centers, leaving communities with environmental and infrastructure costs while primarily benefiting corporate shareholders. Rafter emphasizes New Hampshire's tradition of local control over zoning, land use, and development, asserting that residents should have a strong voice in decisions that affect their towns and quality of life. The debate, he states, transcends a single project and speaks to the kind of state New Hampshire wishes to be.