Where 2026 Michigan governor candidates stand on data centers
News ClipDetroit Free Press·MI·5/4/2026
Michigan's 2026 gubernatorial candidates are actively discussing their stances on data center development, highlighting a consensus around economic benefits balanced with concerns for natural resources and energy infrastructure. Key themes include ensuring developers pay for energy and water use, protecting natural resources, and maintaining local control over siting decisions. Candidates like Benson, Cox, Duggan, James, Johnson, Nesbitt, and Swanson have shared their views on regulating data center projects statewide.
governmentelectricitywaterenvironmentalmoratoriumzoningopposition
Gov: Michigan Department of State, Michigan Senate, Genesee County, City of Detroit
As Michigan eyes further data center development driven by AI demand, the issue is emerging as a significant topic for the state's 2026 gubernatorial candidates. A survey shows widespread public awareness of data centers, leading candidates to address their potential impacts and benefits.
Several major candidates, including Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, former Attorney General Cox, former Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan, Congressman John James, businessman Johnson, Michigan Senate Republican Leader Aric Nesbitt, and Genesee County Sheriff Chris Swanson, largely agree that data centers can bring jobs, particularly in construction. However, they emphasize that developers must operate responsibly, pay for energy consumption, and not strain natural resources, especially water.
Candidates propose various safeguards: Benson advocates for standards, guardrails, public hearings, and transparent developer disclosures. Cox supports continued local decision-making and suggests communities exercise their right to enact moratoriums. Duggan aims to establish a single statewide standard for data center siting, mandate transparency agreements, ensure full energy cost payment by operators, and promote less water-intensive cooling systems, while also offering legal assistance to communities to prevent undue pressure. James stresses mindful water usage and the protection of farmland, suggesting brownfield sites as alternatives. Johnson calls for developers to invest in Michigan's energy infrastructure to prevent increased costs for ratepayers. Nesbitt opposes state incentives for tech companies and demands ironclad agreements for energy costs and closed-loop water systems, reinforcing local control. Swanson also emphasizes local residents' say in development decisions and opposes tax credits, while supporting communities able to provide necessary infrastructure.