
Ohio legislature launches new committee focused on data center concerns
News ClipSpringfield News-Sun·OH·5/13/2026
The Ohio General Assembly has formed a new Joint Data Center Committee to study the economic, environmental, and security impacts of data centers across the state. This initiative coincides with a citizen-led constitutional amendment effort proposing to ban data centers exceeding 25 megawatts of power, currently gathering signatures for a statewide ballot. Public concerns regarding water usage, environmental impacts, emissions, and energy costs are driving the committee's focus.
governmentmoratoriumoppositionwaterenvironmentalelectricity
Gov: Ohio General Assembly, House Energy Committee, Senate Energy Committee, Joint Data Center Committee, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Ohio Ballot Board, Rep. Adam Holmes, Sen. Brian Chavez, Sen. Willis Blackshear Jr.
The Ohio General Assembly has established a new Joint Data Center Committee to study the economic, environmental, and security impacts of data center development across the state. Co-chaired by House Energy Committee Chair Rep. Adam Holmes (R-Nashport) and Senate Energy Committee Chair Sen. Brian Chavez (R-Marietta), the eight-member committee aims to provide accurate information to Ohio voters regarding data center issues.
The committee's formation follows growing public discontent, including a citizen constitutional amendment effort that proposes to prohibit data centers with a monthly aggregate demand exceeding 25 megawatts. This amendment has received approval from Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and the Ohio Ballot Board, allowing it to proceed with signature collection for a statewide ballot. Rep. Holmes acknowledged public concerns about data centers' "exorbitant" water usage, negative land and wildlife impacts, emissions, and effects on energy costs.
The committee expects testimony from major industry players like Meta, Google, and Amazon. Sen. Willis Blackshear, Jr. (D-Dayton), one of the two Democrats on the committee, expressed optimism that the committee would be responsive to a broad range of issues, not just economic arguments for data centers. The chairs clarified that the committee's purpose is to inform, not to influence voter calculus on the proposed ban.