New Hampshire congressional candidate raises concerns about data center economic, environmental impact
An opinion piece argues that data centers are not the economic boon they are claimed to be, consuming vast amounts of electricity and water while creating few permanent jobs. The author highlights specific concerns in New Hampshire, including high electricity costs, drought conditions in Grafton County, and the environmental risks of PFAS chemicals. The article also criticizes proposed state legislation, Senate Bill 439, which would remove towns' ability to impose local regulations on data center development.
Robbie Mahrou, an independent candidate for U.S. Congress in New Hampshire's Second District, penned an opinion piece for the Valley News, asserting that data centers do not provide the economic benefits often advertised. Mahrou argues that while AI-related capital expenditure drives significant economic growth, it is concentrated within a narrow band of hyperscale companies like Meta, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, and Oracle, rather than fostering broad-based prosperity. He contends that data centers generate few permanent jobs post-construction, with the cost per job significantly higher than in other sectors.
The article also highlights the environmental strain caused by data centers in New Hampshire. Mahrou notes that state residents already face high electricity costs, and large data centers exacerbate demand, impacting ratepayers. He points to severe drought conditions in Grafton County, including in towns like Lebanon, Enfield, and Hanover, arguing that data centers' heavy water consumption is unsustainable. Furthermore, Mahrou raises concerns about the use of 'forever chemicals' (PFAS) in data center cooling systems and fire suppressants, citing New Hampshire's history with these contaminants.
Mahrou specifically criticizes New Hampshire Senate Bill 439, which he claims would strip towns of their authority to impose local regulations on data center development, such as noise standards, water impact studies, or proof of grid capacity. He advocates for smart legislation to protect communities and ensure local voice, particularly given the environmental and economic facts presented.