Ohio Opinion Calls for Transparency in Data Center Deals

News ClipThe Columbus Dispatch·Mount Orab, Brown County, OH·10/3/2026

The opinion argues that Ohio officials are negotiating data center projects under nondisclosure agreements, leaving residents uninformed about potential electricity, water, environmental and infrastructure impacts. It cites Wilmington and Mount Orab, where officials used NDAs, and notes that Mount Orab adopted a 180-day moratorium after public frustration.

oppositionenvironmentalgovernmentelectricitywatermoratorium
Gov: Mount Orab Village Council, Ohio House Joint Select Committee on Data Centers, Ohio House of Representatives, Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio Department of Development, Ohio Controlling Board

Retired business lawyer Jack D’Aurora argues that Ohio communities need greater transparency as local officials negotiate data center deals behind nondisclosure agreements. He says residents are being left without information about projects’ potential effects on electricity demand, water use, infrastructure, environmental conditions and noise.

The column cites Wilmington officials’ negotiations with an unnamed company and confidential discussions involving Mount Orab officials and contractors in Brown County. After residents voiced concerns, the Mount Orab Village Council voted for a 180-day moratorium on data center development. D’Aurora supports broader legislation, including an expanded version of House Bill 695, to limit NDAs and increase public participation.