Weiser-area residents raise concerns as county weighs proposed data center ordinance

News Clip5:40KTVB·Weiser, Washington County, ID·7/23/2026

Washington County, Idaho, is considering a new ordinance to regulate data center development, prompting mixed reactions from residents. While some residents oppose data centers due to concerns about water use, environmental impact, and disruption to agricultural life, others worry the proposed rules might infringe on private property rights. County commissioners are taking feedback and plan further discussions.

zoningoppositionenvironmentalgovernmentwaterelectricity
Gov: Washington County

Daniel Olivo, a Washington County resident, expresses concerns about a proposed data center ordinance, fearing its impact on local crops, water resources, and the community's agricultural character. He highlights the deep-rooted family history in farming and the potential environmental and health implications of data centers, particularly regarding water pollution from cooling systems. Olivo believes the current draft of the ordinance does not adequately protect the county or its citizens.

Washington County leaders have drafted an ordinance to establish regulations for data center construction, prompted by growing demand for such facilities to support artificial intelligence and the availability of agricultural land being advertised for high-tech industrial projects, like acreage along the Snake River in Weiser. The proposal requires data centers to obtain a special use permit, be built on a minimum of 100 acres, and be located at least two miles from subdivisions or one mile from schools.

Public testimony on the ordinance revealed divided opinions. While some residents argue the rules go too far, potentially violating private property rights, others contend the regulations are insufficient to prevent the negative impacts of large tech developments. County commissioners acknowledge the need for regulations to protect residents, the agricultural economy, and natural resources, stating that doing nothing is not a safe option. They opted to continue discussions, gather more feedback, and revise the ordinance draft before holding another special hearing.