
Data Centers Are Not the Problem. Bad Policy Is.
This article argues that data centers are not the problem, but rather current government policies are. It debunks common criticisms regarding data center electricity and water usage, highlighting their economic benefits. The author advocates for policy reforms like eliminating subsidies and liberalizing electricity markets to address existing challenges.
The article "Data Centers Are Not the Problem. Bad Policy Is." by Scott Lincicome argues against the growing public and political backlash to data centers across the United States, contending that their negative impacts are often exaggerated and stem from flawed government policies rather than the technology itself. Lincicome points out that common objections regarding electricity and water consumption are frequently based on "shoddy pseudoscience" or lack proper comparative context. He cites studies showing data centers can modestly reduce electricity rates by spreading fixed grid costs, and that their water usage is dwarfed by other activities like golf courses and agriculture.
The author emphasizes the significant economic benefits data centers bring, using Northern Virginia, specifically Loudoun County, as a prime example. He highlights that Loudoun County, a major data center hub, gained over $2 billion in tax revenue in 2024, leading to property tax cuts for residents and supporting tens of thousands of construction and operational jobs. Nationally, data center construction has created a "gold rush" for skilled trades, contributing substantially to U.S. GDP and serving as critical infrastructure for the modern economy, including AI and connected devices.
Lincicome asserts that real problems, where they exist, are "almost always a policy choice." He advocates for two primary policy reforms: eliminating state and local subsidies for data center projects, which he argues are unnecessary given the high demand and primarily serve to enrich large tech companies like Google and Amazon, and liberalizing the electricity market. He calls for permitting reform, faster interconnection, and investment in transmission and water systems to enable supply to meet demand, rather than imposing moratoria.
He also suggests allowing data center developers to contract directly with private generators or build their own power through "consumer-regulated electricity" reforms, noting some states are already experimenting with this. The piece concludes by advocating for local control over land use decisions rather than federal bans, allowing communities to weigh benefits against local impacts and negotiate site-specific terms with developers.