Data Center Boom Reaches West Georgia, Raising Questions Amid Mounting Opposition

Data Center Boom Reaches West Georgia, Raising Questions Amid Mounting Opposition

News ClipInside Climate News·Columbus, Muscogee County, GA·4/13/2026

A proposed hyperscale data center, 'Project Ruby,' in Muscogee County, Georgia, is facing significant community opposition due to concerns about its environmental impact, water and electricity consumption, and potential tax incentives. Local residents, including Kim Hicks, are actively campaigning against the $5 billion project, which could draw 600 megawatts of electricity and hundreds of thousands of gallons of water daily. Despite a nonbinding zoning framework approval, residents demand more transparency and a say in the development, while local officials, like Mayor B.H. "Skip" Henderson, aim to establish early standards for such projects.

zoningoppositionenvironmentalelectricitywatergovernment
Gov: City Planning Advisory Commission, Columbus City Council, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Choose Columbus, Columbus Water Works
COLUMBUS, Ga. – A proposed hyperscale data center known as “Project Ruby” in Muscogee County, Georgia, has sparked widespread opposition among local residents concerned about its potential environmental and economic impacts. The project, slated for 900 acres of forest and creek land, is a major development tied to the expansion of artificial intelligence and cloud computing, with early plans for four buildings that could consume 600 megawatts of electricity and use approximately 330,000 gallons of water daily, according to Missy Kendrick, president of Choose Columbus. Residents like Kim Hicks have taken direct action, painting “No Data Center” messages on a community rock and actively engaging in protests and public meetings. Over 4,000 signatures have been collected on a petition opposing the development. Concerns raised by community members include rising electricity costs, potential impacts on local water supplies and the Chattahoochee River network, threats to wildlife like gopher tortoises, and decreased property values. They also cite a lack of transparency regarding the project’s end user and long-term implications. While the city’s Planning Advisory Commission recently approved a nonbinding zoning overlay framework, additional approvals are still required. Mayor B.H. “Skip” Henderson and City Council members, including Toyia Tucker, acknowledge residents’ concerns and stress the importance of establishing clear expectations and guardrails for future data center proposals. Companies involved in early planning, such as Atlas Development, Habitat Real Estate Partners, and Flint Energies, have attended public meetings. Critics argue that the project's scale and rapid progression outpace public understanding and official oversight. State lawmakers recently adjourned without passing measures to regulate data center expansion or scale back tax incentives, leaving existing policies largely unchanged. Environmental experts like Chris Manganiello of Chattahoochee Riverkeeper warn about the strain on water supplies during droughts and the ecological impact of heated wastewater, while policy analysts like Quentin Good of Frontier Group highlight the broader environmental and economic costs potentially borne by the community.