Andrew DeMillo: Arkansas’ data center fights boil down to trust and transparency

Andrew DeMillo: Arkansas’ data center fights boil down to trust and transparency

News ClipMagnolia Reporter·Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR·5/28/2026

Pulaski County, Arkansas, has become a focal point for data center opposition, with residents and officials calling for a moratorium and local regulations due to concerns over water usage, utility rates, and lack of transparency. Projects by Google and AVAIO Digital are specifically mentioned as facing pushback. This local debate reflects a growing statewide and national trend of communities resisting data center developments.

oppositionmoratoriumgovernmentelectricitywater
Google
Gov: Pulaski County Quorum Court, Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott, Arkansas lawmakers, state officials, Wendell Griffen

Pulaski County, Arkansas, has emerged as a key battleground in the ongoing debate over data center development, with opponents advocating for a moratorium on new facilities to allow for the implementation of local-level restrictions. Concerns cited by residents and officials include excessive water usage, potential impacts on utility rates, and broader quality-of-life issues.

Two specific data center projects, one by Google and another by Connecticut-based AVAIO Digital, are planned for Pulaski County. While supporters highlight the potential for increased tax revenue and job creation, figures like Wendell Griffen, the Democratic nominee for the county's top elected administrator, and Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott are pushing for more county and city-level regulation of these facilities. This local resistance aligns with a national trend of increasing public trepidation toward data centers, with a recent Gallup poll indicating more opposition to data centers than to nuclear power plants in local areas.

A significant point of contention is the secrecy surrounding economic development deals involving data centers. Critics argue that broad nondisclosure agreements prevent the public from accessing crucial details, hindering informed debate. Despite state officials' arguments that confidentiality is necessary for economic competitiveness, the local backlash in places like Pulaski County and Conway demonstrates the dangers of this approach. Supporters of the Pulaski County projects have launched a website to counter what they term "misinformation," indicating an awareness of the public image challenge. As Arkansas anticipates more data center proposals, particularly in rural areas, earning public trust through transparency is identified as crucial for navigating this complex issue.