
Lawmakers push data center accountability as Michigan prepares for midterms
Michigan lawmakers are considering bills to impose a moratorium on data center approvals and introduce stricter regulations regarding electricity costs, water usage, and community benefits agreements. Governor Gretchen Whitmer opposes a statewide moratorium but supports stronger regulations, while Attorney General Dana Nessel has challenged a specific data center's power contracts due to transparency concerns. These issues are becoming central to Michigan's upcoming midterm election.
Michigan lawmakers are actively debating new regulations and a potential moratorium on data center development amidst growing community concerns over environmental impact, resource strain, and transparency. Several bills have been introduced in the state Legislature, including a bipartisan House package proposing a moratorium on data center approvals until April 2027. Additionally, Michigan House Democrats have put forth legislation that would mandate data centers cover full electricity costs, sign community benefits agreements, regulate water usage, and conduct noise studies, while also banning nondisclosure agreements between developers and local governments.
Governor Gretchen Whitmer has stated her opposition to a statewide moratorium but supports the implementation of stricter regulations for data centers. These legislative efforts come as officials grapple with the rapid expansion of "hyperscale" facilities, particularly those powering generative AI, which demand significant electricity and water.
Attorney General Dana Nessel has challenged power contracts for a 1.4-gigawatt Oracle and OpenAI data center under construction in Saline Township, appealing the Michigan Public Service Commission's approval. Nessel cites a lack of transparency regarding the facility's electricity and water consumption and insufficient public input. Critics argue that Michigan's existing tax incentives for data centers, coupled with a lack of robust regulatory oversight, leave the state vulnerable to unchecked development that could strain its aging infrastructure and natural resources. This issue is projected to be a key factor in Michigan's 2026 midterm election.