How long is enough for a data center moratorium? Residents weigh in
Montgomery County, Maryland, is grappling with multiple proposals for a data center moratorium, ranging from six months to two years, driven by resident concerns over environmental impacts, water usage, and energy demands. An executive order has already enacted a six-month pause on new permits, while the County Council debates competing bills and a proposed zoning text amendment. A specific project by Atmosphere Data Centers in Dickerson is pending review amidst this policy debate.
Dozens of environmental advocates rallied outside the Montgomery County Council office in Rockville, Maryland, supporting a proposed two-year moratorium on new data center permits. Groups like Food and Water Watch and the Climate Coalition of Montgomery County voiced concerns about water demands on the Potomac River and increased electricity bills, advocating for a longer pause to study the industry's impacts before significant development proceeds. Councilmembers Will Jawando and Kristin Mink organized the rally ahead of public hearings on legislation to halt data center development in the county.
Inside the council hearings, opinions varied, with some favoring a six-month pause, others pushing for no moratorium, and a few demanding a total ban. Esther Wells, president of the Montgomery County Taxpayer's League, argued against development pauses, citing potential harm to businesses. Steven Findlay of the Sugarloaf Citizens Association suggested an indefinite pause until comprehensive regulations addressing energy, water, and economic issues could be drafted. Amidst this debate, Atmosphere Data Centers plans to build a campus of five data centers in Dickerson, with its CEO Chuck McBride expressing respect for the county's evaluation process. The County Planning Board is set to review Atmosphere Data Centers' application next month.
County Executive Marc Elrich recently signed an executive order implementing a six-month moratorium on new data center permit applications, though competing bills are still being advanced in the council. Councilmember Jawando introduced a bill for a two-year moratorium, while Councilmember Evan Glass, who initially proposed a six-month pause and a task force, continues to push for strong safeguards. Councilmember Andrew Friedson supports the executive order and a proposed zoning text amendment to limit data center locations and mandate renewable power and non-potable water use, which the Planning, Housing and Parks Committee will review in July. The ongoing debate underscores the county's efforts to balance economic development with environmental and community concerns.