Portland Pushback Continues On Data Center

Portland Pushback Continues On Data Center

News ClipPost Journal·Portland, Chautauqua County, NY·5/15/2026

The Town of Portland Board's resolution expressing general support for a potential data center project at the Sugar Hill Golf Course has sparked strong community opposition. Residents voiced concerns over environmental impact, energy, and water usage, forming groups and signing a petition. Although a moratorium was requested by the community, the Town Attorney stated it is unnecessary as data centers are not a permitted use under current zoning laws.

oppositiongovernmentenvironmentalelectricitywaterzoningmoratorium
Gov: Town of Portland Board, Town Supervisor Rich Lewis, Board member Tammy Thompson, Town Attorney Joel Seachrist, New York state, Planning Board
The Town of Portland, New York, is facing significant community backlash following a Town Board resolution on March 11 expressing "general support" for a potential data center project at the former Sugar Hill Golf Course. Residents have packed recent Town Board meetings, with over 50 people attending in opposition in May, following 45 minutes of public comments in April, none of which supported the data center. Concerns raised by the community include potential strain on energy and water resources, environmental impact, emissions near Lake Erie, and a perceived lack of clear state guidance on such facilities. Resident Kelly Perlette initiated an online petition against the project, which has garnered over 3,100 signatures. Additionally, a new group, the Grape Belt Community Group, has formed and advocated for a moratorium on data center development. Town Supervisor Rich Lewis and Board member Tammy Thompson defended the Board's initial resolution, clarifying it was merely an "opening of the door" to investigate a potential project that could offer financial benefits to the town's tax base, which is currently 50% tax-exempt. Town Attorney Joel Seachrist explained that data centers are not currently a permitted use under Portland's zoning laws, and no formal proposal, site plans, or special use permits have been submitted or considered by the Town Board or Planning Board, making a moratorium unnecessary at this stage. Despite assurances that residents would be informed of any future proposals, public criticism continues, with some residents accusing the Board of being influenced by financial incentives.