S.C. Gov. candidates divided on data centers
Candidates for South Carolina governor debated their stances on data centers, with one expressing strong opposition due to concerns over utility rates and bad deals for taxpayers. The other candidate supported responsible data center development, emphasizing that the industry should fully cover its own energy and infrastructure costs. The discussion highlighted differing views on economic benefits versus financial burdens on residents.
During a recent South Carolina gubernatorial debate, candidates presented contrasting views on data center development within the state. One candidate, criticizing the 'political ruling class' for making poor deals, declared strong opposition to data centers, arguing that communities should not be forced to host them if they do not wish to. This candidate voiced concerns that taxpayers ultimately bear the costs of such deals, referencing a $10 billion hole at Santee Cooper, the state-owned utility, which was only discovered after funds were spent.
In contrast, the opposing candidate supported data centers, provided they are developed "responsibly and safely." This candidate emphasized the importance of controlling data domestically, citing the need to protect children's online information. A key point of their platform was that data centers must be self-sufficient, covering all their expenses including energy, water, and infrastructure, without burdening South Carolina ratepayers. The candidate suggested Florida's approach to large data centers as a model for the state, asserting that if data centers wish to establish themselves in South Carolina, they must find a way to fund their own electricity needs.