'Can we just say no?' Supervisors continue data center discussion | Daily Gate City - Keokuk, Iowa
Residents in Lee County, Iowa, expressed strong opposition to data center development during public forums hosted by the Lee County Board of Supervisors. The board is actively crafting an ordinance to regulate data centers, with discussions focusing on potential energy deficits, noise, tax implications, and the possibility of extending a moratorium on construction.
The Lee County Board of Supervisors hosted a public forum in Keokuk, Iowa, where dozens of residents voiced significant opposition to data center development. This meeting was part of a series intended to inform the board as they craft an ordinance regulating data centers and the potential use of small nuclear power plants in the county. Supervisors Ginger Knisley, Garry Seyb, and Chuck Holmes engaged with community members during the discussion.
Key concerns raised included potential energy deficits, with Jim Vawter warning about the county's energy capacity, and Connie Knox highlighting noise pollution's impact on human and animal health. Jeff Kurtz suggested extending a moratorium on data center construction for another year and questioned the financial incentives for projects like a proposed Bitcoin mining operation near Fort Madison, arguing it could burden taxpayers. Residents also discussed property rights, the county's lack of zoning, and the need for economic impact studies, with Nicole Hendrickson asking if the county could hold companies accountable. Keokuk City Council Member Tyler Walker urged caution to avoid further population loss and suggested the Elkem-Carbide property as a potential data center site, though residents demanded greater buffer distances.
Supervisor Seyb acknowledged the widespread use of data centers but emphasized property rights. Supervisor Holmes mentioned that the county is considering discontinuing tax abatements due to new state rules on property tax collection. The board aims to finalize a draft ordinance by December, with another public meeting scheduled before a final decision. Discussion also briefly touched upon the safety of nuclear power, drawing mixed reactions from attendees.