Ypsilanti Twp. leaders push back against Michigan data center project

News Clip4:03FOX 2 Detroit·Ypsilanti, Washtenaw County, MI·8/12/2026

Ypsilanti Township leaders and a University of Michigan regent are opposing the university's plan to build a $1.2 billion data center, citing environmental racism and lack of community input. The project, intended for the Los Alamos National Lab, is planned along the Huron River, sparking concerns despite the university's assertion of its right to proceed due to state charter provisions. Local officials are seeking legal advice to challenge the project.

oppositionenvironmentalgovernmentzoning
Gov: University of Michigan, Ypsilanti Township, Los Alamos National Lab

The University of Michigan faces significant opposition from Ypsilanti Township leaders and one of its own regents over a proposed $1.2 billion data center. The facility, intended to serve the university and Los Alamos National Lab for national security research, is planned along the Huron River. Township officials have labeled the project "environmental racism," citing the area's lower average income and higher percentage of Black and Brown residents, as well as a lack of community engagement in the decision-making process.

Regent Paul Brown has publicly stated his opposition, expressing disappointment that the university is proceeding despite local concerns and choosing a "green field site" next to the Huron River. Brown, who previously served on the board of the Michigan League of Conservation Voters, also emphasized the university's obligation as a public institution to listen to its constituents. He clarified that the project would not involve nuclear materials or testing.

Despite the pushback, the University of Michigan reportedly intends to move forward. Township officials, however, are exploring legal avenues, consulting with attorneys across the country. They acknowledge that the university's state charter may grant them the right to purchase the land and proceed without requiring approval from township officials, which complicates local recourse. The ongoing contention highlights a clash between institutional development plans and community concerns.